Last modified: 2014-09-13 by andrew weeks
Keywords: specification: colour | colour | tallit |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
See also:
Other sites:
In Smith 1975 you will find
that Israel and Greece both use a fairly dark blue, though they
are slightly different from each other. The Israeli blue is as
dark as any of the Blue Ensigns shown
in the book, and the Greek flag is of a very slightly lighter
shade. They both stand in sharp contrast to the light blue of Argentina, Botswana, Fiji etc.
Nick Artimovich, 27 February 1996
The blue colour in Israel's flag is definitely dark. Some time
ago I got a folder on national symbols from the Embassy of Israel
in Washington. In the flag drawing the blue is dark, the text
defines it as Yale Blue.
Jan Oskar Engene, 27 February 1996
The flag of Israel is decidedly not any single shade of blue.
It is based on a tallit, a religious
article of clothing. The color of blue meant to be used on the tallit
is not known and in fact everything from black to reddish purple
is used to denote it with different religious and political
connotations. The most common color (the light blue) comes from
the fact that the tallit most people wear (including
mine) is a light blue with the deliberate statement of "this
is most probably not the right color". Many people,
including me, would find black as acceptable as the current shade
of blue. The reddish tones of purple could get you into an
argument. For the State of Israel to make any definite
proclamation beyond "blue" could incite violence (!)
and questions as to what exactly what shade of the color it is
are probably viewed with suspicion of "looking for a
fight". There are enough people opposed to using blue at
all, to begin with.
Jacob Faturechi, 21 October 1996
The 1948 Flag Proclamation
describes the colour of two wide stripes as dark sky-blue (Tkhelet
Ke'he, the same colour as specified for the
civil ensign) but the Magen David
as simply sky-blue (Tkhelet). However both are the same
shade of blue.
Dov Gutterman, 23 August 2001
I have carried out a research on the origin of Israeli flags.
The main conclusion is that all Israeli flags
use the same shade of blue which is prescribed
by law as 'dark azure' or 'dark sky-blue' (Tkhelet Ke'he
— plain blue in Hebrew is Kahol). This includes all
components —stripes, Magen David and
background— of the national flag, the civil ensign, customs
flag and the war ensign. Moreover,
the rank flags use the same shade of
blue for the Magen David and stripes in the canton as
for the background.
Dov Gutterman, 8 September 2001
Even though the legislation uses the same blue for
all flags (national, civil ensign, naval
ensign and customs flags), in
actual practice a darker shade is used for naval flags [civil and war
ensigns] and police flags. If you see
a naval ensign next to the national flag —as I see daily
passing by the maritime and naval museum in Haifa— the
difference is quite clear.
Dov Gutterman, 6 February 2002 and 6 February 2003
The shade of blue of the Israeli flag is not determined in the
legislation. Album des Pavillons
2000 uses Pantone 280c which seems to me quite appropiate.
Dov Gutterman, 7 March 2002
I saw Jan Oskar Engene description of the colour of
the Israeli flag which is described as "Yale
blue". To get the correct colour, I contacted
Yale University and found out that four shades of blue are used
depending on where the colours are displayed. The idea
is that all the colours would appear the same whatever the
weather conditions. However, the standard blue is Pantone
289. Depending on the ambient lighting conditions,
Pantone 286, 287 and 647 are also used. I generally
take PMS 289 as the colour of the flag.
William E. Hitchins, 3 September 2007
Are you sure that Israel intended to mean "whatever Yale
University says" when they said "Yale Blue?"
Nathan Lamm, 4 September 2007
The Israel State Archives are having an exhibit of many of
their holdings at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. It seems to me
that here is the decision
on the shade of blue for the IL flag at <www.imj.org.il>.
Željko Heimer, 26 October 2008
I visited the exhibit. There were details of the color. There
was a swatch of fabric along with instructions for dying to bring
out "100%" of the color. The color was "FC Caledon
Blue RC 500". Željko linked to the actual law, which defines
the color as "Indanthren Calidon" or, in short form,
"GCDN".
There was also a video interview the state archivist. She had a
card with a number of swatches of blue fabric, pointed to the one
selected, and held out a modern Israeli flag and placed it next
to the swatch. After all that buildup, what happened next was
quite funny: The colors didn't match. "Lo mamash
aval...b'seder," she said, which, loosely translated, means,
"Not exactly, but...it's OK."
Nathan Lamm, 26 October 2008
The exhibition title this document as "official
resolution about the shade of the blue color of the state's
flag".
However, unfortunately, I can t accept it as such. Such a
resolution was never published at the official gazette so it was
never became a legislation.
What we have is a conclusion of a sub-committee that was
appointed at the time. It seems that it was a public committee as
two members (Krakaur and ElHannani) were two of the leading
architects of Israel at the time and no civil servants. (BTW-
both bio's don't mention this episode).
In any case, they choose "Indanthren Calidon" or in
short GCDN.
They also suggest that the state will purchase flags from one
factory and that factories will have to get a special permit and
to be supervised by the Inspector of the Inventory.
If you want my guess, those conclusions and suggestions were
filed at the time at the proper file, in order to be revealed
almost 60 years later.....
Dov Gutterman, 27 October 2008
The protocol manual for the London 2012 Olympics (Flags and Anthems
Manual London 2012
For Israel: PMS 300 blue. The vertical flag is simply the horizontal version turned
90 degrees clockwise
The color blue in the flag of Israel derives from the ancient
dye tekhelet, mentioned many times in the bible (Numbers
15:37-39). This color was used to dye a thread of the ritual
fringes, or tzitzit that all Jewish males are commanded
to wear, and which are tied to the corners of the ritual garment,
the tallit. This is a specific color, derived from the
dye produced by the snail Murex trunculus, known in
Hebrew as the hilazon. This is the same dye known
historically as Tyrian purple. The confusion of shades
comes from the fact (rediscovered recently) that when wool dyed
with the dye from Murex was exposed to sunlight, the dye became a
bright blue, but when the dyed wool was hidden from light, the
color produced was that of royal purple. This change is
due to the exposure of the compound dibromoindigo (purple) to
ultraviolet light, producing the compound indigo (blue,
chemically identical to the vegetable dye). This can be an
explanation why some Israeli flags (in the past) were almost
colored purple, while others are sky blue — these two colors
were seen as deriving from the same natural source (the Hebrew
word argaman was used for the purple shade). This color
is of immense symbolic importance in Judaism and was used in many
articles in the Temple in Jerusalem as well, including the outer
robe of the high priest. An excellent discussion about the
symbolism and ritual importance of this specific blue dye in
Judaism can be found at this website
[including]: "And the Rabbis said: Why does the Torah enjoin
us regarding tekhelet? Because tekhelet resembles sapphire,
and the Tablets were of sapphire, to tell you that so long as
the people of Yisrael gaze upon this tekhelet they are
reminded of that which is inscribed on the Tablets and they
fulfill it, and so it is written, 'And you shall see it and
remember.'" In ancient times purple and blue dyes derived from snails
were so rare and sought after that they were literally worth
their weight in gold. These precious dyes colored the robes
of the kings and princes of Media, Babylon, Egypt, Greece and
Rome. To wear them was to be identified with royalty. Ted Kandell, 6 December 2001 It is frequently said that the Israeli flag is designed to
resemble a Jewish prayer shawl (tallit), which is white with
stripes (no Shield of David — that is a flag-only feature).
However, the tallit (and, occasionally, the smaller tallit katan)
usually has black, not blue, stripes, and therein lies a tale. The fringes, as worn in antiquity (on many garments, not just
prayer shawls — any four-cornered garment must have them,
and garments of that kind [e.g. togas] were more widely worn back
then; now, without such garments, the prayer shawls are specially
made) and again by many today, are both white and blue, with the
white, in some opinions, outnumbering the blue. It is said that
when the source and process of dying was lost about 1500 years
ago, and Jews were left with only white threads (a practice
anticipated and approved of by the Talmud, the corpus of Jewish
law, about three hundred years earlier), they began to
incorporate colored stripes into their garments to commemorate
the lost blue threads (with white still predominating, as it may
have on the threads themselves, leaving colored stripes on a
white garment). The color here was not important, as it was only
custom — there are all-white shawls, white-on-white stripes,
rainbow stripes, and many others. Black came to predominate, at
least in Europe. This may be because black dye was cheapest, or
because of a misreading of Maimonides' law code — he uses a
word which could mean either "dark" or
"black" to describe the original, fringe-dye. He
obviously means "dark," as in "dark blue," as
the fact that it was blue was well known (see below), and he was
limiting it (other opinions range from reddish or purplish blue
all the way to greenish blue or green). However, some read this
as "black" and dyed their stripes accordingly. Others, however, especially in Africa and Asia, had their
stripes the original blue. I have even heard an opinion that this
was an ancient practice, dating to when dyed fringes were worn
— the shawl was dyed to match the threads, white with some
blue (stripes). With the blue fringes lost, some changed the
stripes to black, so it would only be a commemeration. The Rev.
Ezra Stiles of Yale University in the 18th Century reports that
Rabbi Isaac Carigal, an emmissary from Turkey and Israel, wore
blue stripes on his tallit, by the way. I imagine the founding Zionists prefered blue to black, for
both historical as well as aesthetic reasons, and, although the
story runs that a European proposed the pattern pointing to his
prayer shawl, they probably chose the African/Asian colors
immediately. A page on the Israeli Foreign Ministry's site claims that the
Shield of David, historically a secular symbol, was added to
offset the religious imagery of the Tallit, with something
similar happening to the State arms (olive branches [secular,
perhaps] added to a menorah [religious]). An interesting theory. And why blue? The Talmud explains that it is meant to evoke
the sea, both in color as well as in source (a sea snail). The
sea's color reminds us of the heavens' color (blue), and, of
course, heaven reminds us of God. One last story. During World War II, playwright Ben Hecht
wrote A Flag is Born, a play alerting the world to the
Holocaust. In it, an old Jewish couple, escaping from Europe,
gives a tallit to a young Jew right before they die. The young
man turns the tallit into a flag and goes off to fight for a
Jewish state — which happens to fictionalize an actual
event, described above. Just for the record, A Flag is Born was actually
conceived and written after World War Two, according to
the American
Jewish Historical Society. I had been told as a youth that many shawls used black instead
of blue in memory of the destruction of the Temple in the year
70. Is this legend or is there anything to it? I have heard of this as well, but cannot find it in any
reference works I have checked. The presence of the stripes, and
their dark color, are definitely because of the blue dye of the
threads, but black is a bit unclear — it may be because of
the reason you wrote. A problem is that Judaism never really used
black for mourning. When white is used for purity (it is also
used for shrouds), its opposite is given as scarlet. A similar
claim, that Hasidic and other ultra-Orthodox Jews wear black as a
sign of mourning for the Temple, fails for the same reasons
— it may be somber, but not really mourning. Of course,
black may have been used for mourning because surrounding
peoples, especially European, used it. This would explain why
European Jews use black, but not Sephardic Jews. Much about colours in Judaism, specifically with vexillologic
orientation, may be found in Ruder
1999. I have more recently read that one possibility may be the
common classical-era (Greek, Roman etc.) practice of putting
designs on the edges of garments — this carried over to
Jewish religious garments as stripes. With regard to the colours in the tallit, this is
somewhat controversial, especially depending on whether you're
Orthodox or not. Originally, the blue used was called
tekhelet but the formula was lost a few hundred years ago. Since
the middle of the 19th century, there have been attempts to
discover what animal was used to make the colour and the process
to extract it. Some people claim to have rediscovered
it but this is still controversial. I understand that
there is a small firm in Israel that makes material it claims is
of the colour tekhelet. If you like to watch
pop archaeology, there have been a couple of episodes of the
Naked Archaeologist on cable television devoted to this
subject. The problem with using blue on the tallit is
that purists say it should not be used because you can't be sure
that it is tekhelet. There are two firm, from two different sources. Furthermore,
since the dye is handmade and depends on a variable source of
ultraviolet light (i.e., the Sun) to turn from purple to blue,
the shades can be different from set to set. I wear the blue dye
on both my "large" and "small" tallitot,
and have several of the latter, and the shade of dye is different
on each. Generally, a darkish blue. If you want to know about the blue used in tzitzit,
namely the colour know in Biblical sources as tekhelet, I
recommend the book by Zvi Ruder [rud99],
where he covers the story in details with all the historical
background and modern repercussions. By the late 19th Century, when the modern Israeli flag was
being designed, stripes had been a feature on tallitot
for centuries if not longer. The point is, that there is no religious requirement for the
stripes, as some may imply, and there is certainly no requirement
that these be blue. They may be blue, but may be of any other
colour (including white...) Also, the main part of the talith
itself is not necesserly white - there are rabbinic authorities
who clearly describe it being entirely of other colours. Of
course, such talith were and still are extremely rare
and probably just theoretic.
Ian Sumner, 11 Oct 2012
Origins of the Colours and the Stripes
(Mishnat Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 14).
Nathan Lamm, 7 December 2001
Santiago Dotor, 7 December 2001
Al Kirsch, 7 December 2001
Nathan Lamm, 7 December 2001
Željko Heimer, 7 December 2001
Nathan Lamm, 17 May 2004
William E. Hitchins, 3 September 2007
Nathan Lamm, 4 September 2007
On the other hand, you may want to see my article [zhe06a] based on this book, that
sumarises it in this regard, but this is, alas, published in
Croatian only, so far: at <www.zoz.hr/2098_1.pdf>
and <www.zoz.hr/2099_web.pdf>).
However, it should be clear that the colour of tekhelet
is not meant to be in the talit - the shawl, but in the tzitzit,
the fringe that are attached in it. The talith itself
could be of any colour, and the stripes could be of any other (or
not at all present for that matter). The historical taliths (of
"modern era"), in fact, rarely used anything else
beside black for the stripes, while the modern taliths
are to be found in many different combinations including such
that uses stripes of "all the colours of the rainbow"
(see example at <www.jewishsource.com>).
As Zvi explains in his book, the connection between the colour tekhelet
and the colour of the stripes in the taliths must be
some kind of error, although it is firmly rooted in the
"mythical" memory of both Jews and Gentiles
There seems to be no evidence that there were any special taliths
or prayer shawls being in use in the period of the clasical
Jewish state and the Temple in Jereusalem - as there was no need
for it. The teliths seems to be "invention" of
post-Temple period - when the clothing ways also begun to change
so the need for special piece of rectangular clothing was needed
to fulfill the religious requirements.
For example the variety of taliths on the painting byx
Maurice Gottlieb "Jews Praying in the Synagogue on Yom
Kippur" 1878 at wikipedia.
Željko Heimer, 4 September 2007
In Ashkenazic (Northern European) countries. There is
some evidence that (at least some) Sephardic (Southern
Europe/Mediterreanian) Jews wore blue stripes. For example, Rev.
Ezra Stiles, president of Yale University in the 1700's,
describes a Turkish Jewish friend as wearing a blue-striped
tallit. Furthermore, stripes are, by now, universal, even if only
white-on-white.
There have been suggestions that the stripes ultimately derive
from the stripes worn on the edges of Greek and Roman togas.
Nathan Lamm, 4 September 2007
It seems that rabbinic literature does not "study"
stripes on the taliths, the main concern for them are
colours in the fringe (tzitzit) where tekhelet
thread should appear (and where today as a rule it does not, due
to the loss of the craft of preparing the exact blue dye).
Željko Heimer, 4 September 2007
