Last modified: 2013-02-24 by ivan sache
Keywords: luxembourg | luxemburg | letzebuerg | europe | lion (red) | roude leiw | civil ensign | law | flag change |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
![[Flag of Luxembourg]](../images/l/lu.gif)
![[Alternative national flag]](../images/l/lu-alt.gif)
Flag of Luxembourg (left, proportions 3:5; right, proportions 1:2) - Images by António Martins, 17 May 2002 (after Album des Pavillons [pay00])
Description: Three horizontal stripes, red-white-light
blue.
Proportions: 3:5 or 1:2
Use: on land, as the civil, state and war flag.
Colour official specifications (Grand Duke's Regulation from 27 July 1993):
Colour approximate specifications (Album des Pavillons [pay00]) :
On this page:
See also:
At the Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815, when the Kingdom of the
Netherlands was founded, King William I (of Orange-Nassau) also
received Luxembourg as a compensation for the loss of the Nassau
lands in Germany. The territory was placed under the Dutch Constitution, in
practice becoming the 18th province, and became also a Grand Duchy, member of the German Confederation.
In 1830 Luxembourg participated in the Belgian revolt against the Dutch rule, which caused the independence of Belgium. In 1839 an agreement was reached, in which the western part of Luxembourg remained Belgian as the Province of Luxembourg. The eastern part returned to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, but the administration of the Kingdom and Grand Duchy were separated. Until 1866 the Grand Duchy was member of the German Confederation, the loss of the Walloon part being compensated for the Germans with the Dutch part of Limburg as a Duchy.
King William III had no male successor in 1890. Luxembourg then became fully independent under the Nassau-Weilburg branch.
Mark Sensen, 17 May 2002
1845 Circular Letter
According to Crampton's The World of Flags [cra90], flags in the colours of the arms (red, white and blue) were first used in 1830 during the Belgian revolt. The flag was defined as an horizontal tricolour flag on 12 June 1845.
In an article published in Die Warte, a
weekly cultural supplement of the daily D'Wort (aka Luxemburger
Wort), Jo Kohn states that the current flag was prescribed in June 1845 in a Circular Letter by Governor Ignace de la Fontaine (at the time, the
King of the Netherlands, also the Grand Duke of Luxembourg, was
represented by a Governor). The Circular, addressed to District
Chiefs and Mayors, informed them that the red-white-blue
arrangement should, henceforth, be considered as the national flag.
This followed a period of flags displaying the three colours of the
arms in no fixed arrangement.
The article lists, among its sources, Louis Wirion, Le drapeau
luxembourgeois, in Annuaire 1950. Société héraldique luxembourgeoise, pp. 10-21. Joseph Beffort, Luxembourg.
Mark Sensen, 21 October 2006
1972 Law
The Law prescribing the flag was adopted on 23 June 1972 and
published in the Mémorial. Journal officiel du
Grand-Duché de Luxembourg A-N51 on 16 August 1972.
On the same date was adopted a water canal transport
ensign and at the same time air ensign.
The reasons why these emblems were adopted so lately are simple.
Concerning the national flag there were not any laws protecting
this emblem (as well as the arms of the state and of the Great
Duke), which any country in the world could have adopted as its emblems
(don't forget that many states became independent at that time,
especially in Africa) or which could be misused by everyone. The
other reason is that UNESCO wanted to have the laws and history of the Luxembourg flag at that time.
Concerning the ensign, there is the same reason of emblem protection and also the fact that this ensign was unofficially already used by canal transport crafts on the Mosel to differentiate them from the Dutch crafts. The canalisation of the Mosel in the 1960-1970s which made Dutch boats capable to go to Luxembourg, with the problem of knowing who was who, urged the government to take measures.
Pascal Vagnat & Christopher Southworth, 14 February 2005
1993 Amendment
The alternative proportions of 3:5 or 1:2 were established by the amendment of 27 July 1993, as well as the colours of the flag, red Pantone 032c and blue Pantone 299c.
Therefore, people or the authorities can use (and in fact use) both 3:5 and
1:2 flags, though the 3:5 model is the more common and the 1:2 seems
to be rare.
Pascal Vagnat & Christopher Southworth, 14 February 2005
The protocol manual for the London 2012 Olympics (Flags and Anthems Manual London 2012 [loc12]) provides recommendations for national flag designs. Each NOC was sent an image of the flag, including the PMS shades, for their approval by LOCOG. Once this was obtained, LOCOG produced a 60 x 90 cm version of the flag for further approval. So, while these specs may not be the official, government, version of each flag, they are certainly what the NOC believed the flag to be.
For Luxembourg, PMS 032 red, 299 blue (legal specifications). The vertical flag is simply the horizontal version turned 90 degrees anti-clockwise.
Ian Sumner, 10 October 2012
Before 1993, the shade of the blue stripe was not defined. For example Flaggenbuch [neu92] (1941) shows a dark blue stripe, without specification of the proportions, as is to be expected.
Željko Heimer, 16 May 2002
Netherlands vs. Luxembourg flag
The flags of the Netherlands and of
Luxembourg (as they are known internationally) are similar, but not
the same, and it is just a coincidence, nothing to do with having any
common origin. The colours of Luxembourg are derived from the coat of arms. The Dutch flag, which is always with 2:3 proportions.
However, because the flags still look similar at a distance,
Luxembourg has a distinct flag for use on civil
vessels on the Rhine and elsewhere. It is a banner of the national arms.
William Crampton (✝), 20 March 1995
![[Ensign]](../images/l/lu~.gif)
![[Ensign]](../images/l/lu~alt.gif)
Ensign of Luxembourg, two variants
Left, "traditional design" - Image by António Martins & Mark Sensen, 17 May 2002
Right, "modernized design" - Image by Joe McMillan, 14 February 2005, after Album des Pavillons (2000) [pay00]
The ensign of Luxembourg, in proportions 5:7, is made of ten horizontal white and blue stripes with a red lion over all. This is a banner of the lesser national arms, nicknamed Roude Léiw (red lion).
Design of the flag
The ensign was established by the Law on National Emblems of 23 June
1972. The illustrations appended to the text are just a picturial
information, they are not part of the Law (Les armoiries du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, le drapeau national et le pavillon de la batellerie et de l'aviation sont reproduits en annexe à la présente loi, le texte seul faisant foi.)
Accordingly, the illustrations of flags and coat of arms in the laws of Luxembourg do not have any official value. They are shown as examples. It is said seul le texte fait foi, meaning that you can draw whatever flag or coat of arms of Luxembourg based on the text only. No matter what the lion looks like.
Album des Pavillons (2000) [pay00] shows the lion with a forked tail, the ends crossed in saltire. C. Southworth queried the design of this lion with Armand du Payrat, the editor of Album des Pavillons, a few years ago, quoting and sending him a copy of the "Law of the National Emblems" of 27 July 1993 and
accompanying illustrations which apparently amended it. Armand replied that
the new designs were not liked and that the older version remained in use.
P. Vagnat went to Luxemburg city on request of Armand du Payrat. A main flag manufacturer there told him that the new version of the lion was not
liked and the former version still in use.
It could be, of course, that the artistic representation of the lion
used on the official depiction of the arms differs from that used on
flags, provided that both comply with the blazon (tail forked, ends
crossed in saltire, crowned, etc.). There is a photo of the merchant ensign (no longer available online) which matches the Album 2000 lion, but shows the blue stripes much darker.
The Grand-Ducal Regulation of 27 July 1993 which defined the colour of blue
as Pantone 299c specifically included the Ensign in Article 2 (les couleurs du pavillon de la batellerie et de l'aviation sont définies de la façon suivante), so that any use of a darker blue is definitely an unofficial variant.
Christopher Southworth, Joseph McMillan & Pascal Vagnat, 14 February 2005
Use of the flag
Before 1990, the flag was the water canal transport ensign and at
the same time the air ensign.
The Law of 9 November 1990 creating the
Luxembourg public maritime register ( Loi du 9 novembre 1990 ayant pour objet la
création d'un registre public maritime luxembourgeois) makes of the ensign also a sea
ensign (civil, merchant, and why not state):
Les navires immatriculés au registre sont tenus d'arborer le pavillon luxembourgeois qui comme le pavillon de la batellerie et de l'aviation défini à l'article 4 de la loi du 23 juin 1972 sur les emblèmes nationaux, se compose d'une laize de tissus aux proportions de 7 à 5 comportant un burelé d'argent et d'azur de dix pièces au lion rampant de gueules, orienté vers la hampe, couronné, armé et lampassé d'or, la queue fourchue et passée en sautoir. La description du revers correspond à celle de l'avers.
Article 4 of the Law of 17 June 1994 amending the Law of 9 November 1990 (Loi du 17 juin 1994 modifiant et complétant la loi du 9 novembre 1990 ayant pour objet la
création d'un registre public maritime luxembourgeois) does not mention at all
le pavillon de batellerie et de l'aviation and mentions
only le pavillon luxembourgeois, that is the ensign of
Luxembourg.
In the Law of 23 September 1997 about yachting (Loi du 23 septembre 1997 portant
réglementation de la navigation de plaisance et portant
modification de certaines autres dispositions légales), Article 1 defines again the
ensign of Luxembourg, as follows:
Pavillon luxembourgeois :
Le pavillon luxembourgeois est le pavillon tel que défini à l'article 4 de la loi modifiée du 23 juin 1972 sur les emblèmes nationaux. Il se compose d'une laize de tissus aux proportions de 7 à 5 comportant un burelé d'argent et d'azur de dix pièces au lion rampant de gueules, orienté vers la hampe, couronné, armé et lampassé d'or, la queue fourchue et passée en sautoir. La description du revers correspond à celle de l'avers.
Therefore, the ensign of Luxembourg shall be used by:
- ships registered in the Luxembourg maritime register, be they
yachting ships or transport ships;
- ships registered in the inland water register, be they
yachting ships or transport ships.
In the latter case, the proper name of the ensign is "ensign for
inland transport ships", for it was used first for these kinds of
ships.
According to the Law (Article 10: Effets de
l'immatriculation), yachting ships (at sea or on inland
rivers) shall fly the ensign of Luxembourg.
The square version of the ensign is also the obverse of the Army flag and the obverse of the Gendarmerie flag.
Pascal Vagnat, 8 March 2003
![[Two flags]](../images/l/lu-two.jpg)
Close-up of the clock tower of the Town Hall of Vianden - Photo by Ivan Sache, 15 June 2012
The government, as promised when the flag change was turned down (see below), proposed to grant the status of national flag to the two flags. Bill No. 6087, tabled on 23 November 2009, restricts the use of the "red lion" flag on the national territory. The bill should also give an official status to the flags of the Army and of the Police and to the Air Force marking.
As reported by Jean Rhein in Le Quotidien, 7 April 2010, the State Council, in a notice released on 23 March 2010, considers this proposal as "a source of complication and waning of the national identity". The State Council has pointed out, with some sarcasm, a series of issues linked to the adoption of two flags instead of one:
- Shall the Head of the State, the Chamber of Representatives, the
Government and the municipalities use the two flags in the same time
or in turn?
- During a public event, shall one flag be hoisted on the left side of
the road and theother one on the right side of he road?
- Shall the two flags be used in the same number of copies to avoid
vexing anyone?
More seriously, the State Council expressed a main concern: "If any
administration can freely decide to select a flag and exclude the
other one, will the symbol of the common unity [the national flag] be
brought down to the level of expression of a difference, a
particularity if not a dissidence?"
In practice, the two flags can be seen hoisted in several places. For instance, the Town Hall of Vianden flies the two flags, together with the flag of the European Union. The Red Lion flag is more and more seen during sports events - especially cyclist races (I guess the supporters want to be distinguished from the Dutch!).
Ivan Sache, 24 June 2012
Aborted proposal of flag change (2006-2007)
The government of Luxembourg decided on 6 July 2007 that the national flag will not be changed. The "red lion" on blue and white stripes may, however, be granted in the future a legal status for use on land during patriotic, sports or cultural events.
Translating an article published on 6 July 2007 in Tageblatt:
The Council of the Government today officially took the position on the topic of the proposition of deputy Michel Wolter (CSV) aiming at replacing the national flag. The Council opted to have the flag of the Grand-Duchy remain the tricolor red-white-blue banner.
[...] Michel Wolter tabled his law proposal to change the tricolor flag for a national emblem with a very strong symbolic value, dating back to the Middle Ages. His move intended to better personalize the Luxembourg flag, which can be mistaken for the Netherlands flag. The issue has been a matter of polemic, revealing a country profoundly divided on this question: the old-timers seem to prefer the Roude Léiw (the Red Lion) because it is the emblem of the liberation of 1945, while others see in the red lion a sign of a nationalistic withdrawal.
Pascal Vagnat, Mark Sensen, John Udics & Ivan Sache, 23 July 2007
As reported in the newspaper d'Wort, 5 October 2006, the proposal to change the Luxembourg flag (Initiativ Roude Léiw website) will be submitted by none less than the leader of the parliamentary party CSV, Michel Wolter. Note he is not the leader of the party nor even the country's Prime Minister but rather the leader of the party's MPs. Apparently, he will be proposing that Luxembourg drop its tricolour and adopt, instead, the banner of the arms, which currently serves as civil ensign. The reason he gives is that this flag is more distinctive and incorporates the Roude Léiw the Red Lion, which Luxembourgers are very fond of as symbol of their tiny country.
He told d'Wort, Luxembourg's biggest daily and a staunch
supporter of CSV, that he has got the agreement of the other MPs of
his party for putting forward this proposal, but has no idea what the
other parties think. He says if they don't agree and the proposal
fails, "that's still alright".
Significantly, d'Wort (the paper version), also prints a scathing
commentary which states that Luxembourgers have far more serious
problems than a possible change of their national flag and makes it
sound that the whole idea is a an example of Wolter's apparently well-known pigheadedness! Wolter himself says that he discussed the matter with around 300 persons who all voiced support for the idea.
CSV (centre-right) is the country's largest party but does not have
an absolute majority in Parliament, although the country's PM, J.C.
Junker, is a CSV member as have been all Luxembourg's PMs from 1926
to the present day, the exception being the 1974-1979 government of G.
Thorn.
Jan Oskar Engene, 24 October 2006